New Mexico’s Supreme Court says yes to gay marriage

Unanimous ruling says barring people from marrying is unconstitutional


“We hold that the State of New Mexico is constitutionally required to allow same-gender couples to marry,” a ruling delivered by New Mexico’s Supreme Court says.

With the decision, New Mexico becomes the 17 American state to legalize gay marriage.

“Barring individuals from marrying and depriving them of the rights, protections, and responsibilities of civil marriage solely because of their sexual orientation violates the Equal Protection Clause under Article II, Section 18 of the New Mexico Constitution,” the decision states.

The court also dismissed the contention of gay marriage opponents that “defining marriage to prohibit same-gender marriages is related to the important, overriding governmental interests of ‘responsible procreation and childrearing’ and preventing the deinstitutionalization of marriage.”

The court noted that “the aged, the infertile, and those who choose not to have children are not precluded from marrying.” It also pointed out that New Mexico law recognizes gay couples’ right to raise children.

“We need not go further than the record in this case for persuasive evidence that same-gender parents are responsible parents,” the decision reads. “As we have previously discussed, many of the Plaintiffs in this case have been in long-term, committed relationships, and many of them are raising or have raised children and grandchildren.”

Referring to the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Loving v Virginia, which struck down laws prohibiting interracial marriage, the New Mexico court observed that it is “inappropriate to define the governmental interest as maintaining only opposite-gender marriages, just as it was inappropriate to define the governmental interest as maintaining same-race marriages in Loving.

Human Rights Campaign president Chad Griffin hailed the decision. “The court is entirely correct that denying lesbian and gay couples the same rights as everyone else is fundamentally unjust,” he says. “Regardless of where you live, all people should have the ability to marry the person they love, and now the legislature must not do anything to turn back the clock in the Land of Enchantment.”

Natasha Barsotti is originally from Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean. She had high aspirations of representing her country in Olympic Games sprint events, but after a while the firing of the starting gun proved too much for her nerves. So she went off to university instead. Her first professional love has always been journalism. After pursuing a Master of Journalism at UBC , she began freelancing at Xtra West — now Xtra Vancouver — in 2006, becoming a full-time reporter there in 2008.

Keep Reading

Job discrimination against trans and non-binary people is alive and well

OPINION: A study reveals that we have a long way to go to reach workplace equality for trans and non-binary people

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community

Over 300 anti-LGBTQ2S+ bills have been introduced this year. This doesn’t mean we should panic

OPINION: While it’s important to watch out for threats, not all threats are created equally. Some of these bills will die a natural death

Xtra’s top LGBTQ2S+ stories of the year

The best and brightest—even most bewildering—stories from a back catalogue brimming with insight