OA_show('Leaderboard - Xx90');
Choose your edition:

Search form

Homewood turn restriction rejected


Homewood turn restriction rejected

Ward 27 Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam. IMAGE 1 OF 1
Wong-Tam says more community policing needed
Ward 27 Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam says she's surprised so many people in the Homewood Ave neighbourhood rejected a proposed turn restriction, a move that would have attempted to curb sex work in the area.

Of the 1,800 ballots sent out to area residents, Wong-Tam says 200 were returned. Of those, 52 percent were opposed to the turn restriction, while 48 percent supported it.

Wong-Tam has decided not to move forward with the restriction, which would have stopped drivers from turning onto Homewood Ave from Wellesley St E between 11pm and 6am. 

Some local residents hoped the restriction would discourage johns from driving into the neighbourhood and circling the area looking for sex workers or drug dealers.

"It demonstrated to us a number of things," says Wong-Tam. "There was not a general consensus, which is what we were told by the Homewood-Maitland Safety Association (HMSA), which is that everyone wanted this turn restricted."

About 30 local residents blamed sex workers for damage to private property and late-night noise at an Oct 12 meeting with Wong-Tam. She says the margin of error is high because so few ballots were returned.

"There was some pretty active lobbying from those who did want the turn restriction," she says. "So, technically, [those in favour of the restriction] lost."

Wong-Tam says she is already working with Toronto Police Service's 51 Division to step up community policing in the area to make officers more visible to residents and sex workers.

"Police should protect sex workers and keep an eye out for poor social behaviour and activities, respond to noise complaints, vandalism of private property and keep a community presence with the bicycle unit," she says.

"The community told police, 'We need you to show up when we do call.'"

Maggie's, a Toronto sex workers’ organization, maintains it's not streets that need to be altered.

“The problem here is the law, not sex workers,” says Chanelle Gallant, a sex-work activist and communications coordinator for Maggie’s. “Residents should take their concerns up with the lawmakers who have put sex workers in the situation where they can’t exert any control over their work.”

Detective Matt Moyer also says he doesn't believe a turn restriction will do much to curb sex traffic in the area.

"Although the turn restriction will not be implemented, we plan to work with city transportation staff to see if we can improve some of the signage in the area, signs that would tell people that it's a residential neighbourhood and to be mindful of noise," says Wong-Tam.
OA_show('Text Ad - #1');
OA_show('Text Ad - #2');


@ John
Or is that @ the John.
Way to go buddy blame the person working, the person who actually does help keep a face in an area that as of late isn't such a great one at night.
So yes Mr John. I'm guessing that's what they call you, you are the problem not them.
Oh one other thing , John, so called "tranny hookers" clearly make a better representative of the queer community then you do. They aren't out to slag and put others down.
Kristin Wong Tam
I think she's taking an open minded level headed and REALISTIC approach to the situation. Looking at different possible solutions instead of just one.
Complex issues like this take a complex approach.
She also mentions protecting these sex workers...they are human beings as well.
p.s. Kristin Wong Tam is gay John.
not surprised
wong tam is a sad excuse for a councillor, let alone a representative of the gay community tranny hookers have a long long history of bad behaviour, poll or no poll...the truth is they are a problem and she ignores that..... so many people live there up in the sky and in the clouds.... TERRIBLE
She's surprised?
Hmmn? I'm not. The problems are not the sex workers, in an odd way they're keeping the neighbourhood honest. Way to go Homewood residents!
Red light districts are the solution
The article quotes a representative of Maggie’s, a Toronto sex workers’ organization, as stating that “The problem here is the law, not sex workers. Residents should take their concerns up with the lawmakers who have put sex workers in the situation where they can’t exert any control over their work.” This statement is not accurate. Many sex workers are able to earn money without walking the streets (e.g., placing ads in Now Magazine and discreetly seeing customers in their homes). Even if prostitution were decriminalized and sex workers were able to open brothels, there would still be homeowner complaints about late-night traffic, noise and vandalism near the brothels and the sex trade workers who continue to ply their trade on the streets. The only solution is to do what Hamburg and Amsterdam have done and establish red light districts away from residential neighbourhoods. Brothels and street prostitutes would be able operate in the red light district (subject to government licensing, health inspections and taxation just like any other business). Of course, quiet and discreet sex trade worker (with quiet and discreet customers) who work out of their homes without disturbing their neighbours, would still be able to do so undetected - as they are now.
Sign in or Register to post comments