OA_show('Wallpaper');
OA_show('Leaderboard - Xx90');
Choose your edition:

Search form

Feds leave local AIDS groups in the dark on funding

Feds leave local AIDS groups in the dark on funding

IMAGE 1 OF 1
Funding frozen since 2003, may disappear next year
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) has not issued new calls for operational grant proposals for its AIDS Community Action Program (ACAP), leaving some AIDS service organizations worried that funding could disappear in the new year.
 
ACAP directs time-limited grant funding to community-based service organizations as part of the federal government’s HIV/AIDS initiative. Fifty-eight HIV/AIDS community organizations receive funding through ACAP, from Saskatchewan to the Atlantic provinces, including 23 in Ontario. Data for Alberta and British Columbia were not available at press time.
 
The program originally channelled funding into two streams: operational grants and project grants. Funding for the project grants stream was eliminated in 2007, when the Harper government announced it intended to redirect chunks of its existing HIV/AIDS spending toward a new world-class vaccine research centre, which never materialized.
 
The operational funding is still in place for now, but there hasn’t been a new call for proposals since 2003. Instead, projects that received funding from 2003 to 2007 have had their grants rolled over in successive years, with the annual expectation that PHAC would launch a new call for funding proposals the following year.
 
But service organizations have not been given any indication that PHAC is either continuing existing funding or calling for new projects in 2012. With little more than two months left in 2011, AIDS organizations are preparing to wrap up some programs that have been serving people living with HIV/AIDS for the last decade.
 
The AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT) uses funding from ACAP for its health promotion and support programs, a Portuguese-language community development program and caseworker, and its positive-youth outreach program. In 2011, ACT received $309,000 through ACAP for its programming. ACT has a special exemption from a rule that each agency can receive only one grant of up to $75,000 because it has absorbed three smaller agencies that had received ACAP funding since 2003.
 
“We’re absolutely worried that the funding will disappear next year,” says John Maxwell, ACT’s director of programs and services. “We were expecting that announcements were going to come out in mid-September. It usually takes between six and eight months for the federal government to turn around on a grant.”
 
Maxwell says he’s been unable to get straight answers from PHAC about the future of the grants, a sentiment that’s echoed by Toronto People with AIDS Foundation (TPWAF) executive director Murray Jose.
 
Our grant supervisors are unable to answer the questions that we pose them about what’s happening,” Jose says.
 
Sylwia Gomes, a spokesperson for PHAC, says a new call for applications will be made.
 
“The details of a possible solicitation for new AIDS Community Action Program project proposals are still being finalized,” she says. “PHAC will notify public health authorities and community organizations once the solicitation plan is finalized and approved.”
 
However, Gomes could not confirm available funding would be in the same amount or adjusted for inflation. She also refused to speculate about how funding could be continued or bridged if a new call for proposals isn’t issued in time for the start of the 2012 budget year, which starts in March.
 
PHAC is waiting to announce a new plan pending the release of a report into the structure of HIV/AIDS funding programs, for which PHAC held consultations more than a year ago. PHAC refuses to release the report on HIV/AIDS funding until approvals have been granted by the ministry of health.
 
Jose says the loss of ACAP funding could have a cascading effect on his organization. TPWAF receives funding for volunteer services, including a coordinator, training, supports and service delivery.
 
You could be losing the potential to manage all of the volunteers,” Jose says.
 
TWPAF also receives funding for its Poz Prevention program and its Food for Life program, which provides prepared meals for clients with limited mobility.
 
Because there hasn’t been a call for new projects since 2003, AIDS groups have been unable to submit proposals for new projects that might address the changing impact of the disease. Jose also says newer ethnocultural AIDS groups that weren’t around in 2003 have been shut out of applying to ACAP.
 
But while expanding competition for the grants may foster excellence in delivery, Jose worries that PHAC could be moving from focusing the grants on AIDS  community groups to larger community health organizations that may not make AIDS their priority focus or embrace a sex-positive, harm-reduction model of care.
 
The last ACAP project call awarded grants to several community health centres for HIV/AIDS outreach projects.
 
“If they were partnering with an AIDS service organization and jointly delivering a program, then absolutely,” Jose says. “With this specific pot of money and the goals of this pot of money, I think it is concerning when it’s opened up to non-AIDS service organizations.”
 
 
OA_show('Text Ad - #1');
OA_show('Text Ad - #2');

Comments

closeing of doors
In PEI, AIDS PEI is 100% funded by PHAC, not one cent of operational funding from the goverment of PEI. If the PHAC funding is not increased, cut, reshaped, AIDS PEI may close its doors. A "plan B"? In PEI, people don't see HIV/AIDS as an issue, it's a disease "nice people" don't have to worry about. The fact that STI's are going up and up means nothing...
I pray allot!
Hasta la vista, crybaby.
The AIDS service sector is central to the economy of downtown Toronto, other than that, it serves no function. It needs a bail-out as an economic engine, at least until all those dorkwad social workers get retrained into doing something useful. They jumped the shark a long time ago when they made everything from rampant street drug use to barebacking simply a personal choice to be respected, and off limits to criticism in a relativist culture where no one choice is any worse than any other. They are incapable of leadership, beyond signing grant applications. Good riddance to them all.
So?
What's the plan? What are these two very well-paid Directors of ACT (Aids Committee of Toronto, John Maxwell) and TPAWF (Toronto People with Aids Foundation, Murray Jose)organizations doing about it? Sorry to blunt but what's plan B here? They've both known about this potentiality for some time, (several months at least) plenty of time to create, brainstorm and actually put together a kick ass plan B! I'm not worried. They get very well-paid to do this type of thing, I'm sure they have a plan B. They've been working on a plan B for months. Right?
Sign in or Register to post comments