Long-term care facilities: the final frontier?

Conference hears master's project on gays in care


SWAG. No, it isn’t anything illegal. The initials stand for Social Workers in Aging and Gerontology. On May 26, SWAG met in an Ottawa elder-care residence to talk about long-term care (LTC) for gays and lesbians.

LTC is part of a spectrum of housing for the elderly. It is more intensive care than what’s given in a seniors’ residence, with medical staff on hand around the clock.

Erin Richards, whose master’s work was on the subject of gays in long-term care, presented her findings. Her audience took an active part in sharing their own professional experiences.

Richards is a stay-at-home mom for her eight-month-old daughter, but before doing her undergrad and master’s of social work at Carleton, she spent four years working in LTC homes. During that time, she noticed that none of the residents ever self-identified as gay or lesbian, but she thought it unrealistic to believe that none were. She remarked that gays and lesbians in LTC can be targets for three kinds of discrimination: heterosexism, ageism and ableism.

The research for her thesis involved interviews with small groups of older gays and lesbians in Ottawa and Peterborough about the possibility of living in an LTC facility as they age. Her participants were often afraid — afraid of other residents, of staff and of the wider community. There was even fear of physical aggression. Participants in the groups were adamant about not wanting a facility, LTD or retirement home, connected with any religious community.

Some people in the groups would prefer a totally queer setting; some would prefer a sex-segregated environment. The idea of a queer setting would involve both residents and staff. Others in the groups favoured integration in a setting that would allow them to affirm their identity.

Richards suggested three ways to make LTC facilities more gay-friendly. First, she called for building and strengthening community partnerships, including with the queer community. Second, she saw the need for active participation of lesbians and gays in all levels of LTC. Such participation includes volunteering with residents and taking part in diversity training for staff and residents. She also focused on other people who have contact with the homes, such as paramedics.

Finally, overall policy needs to be overtly gay-positive, for example, using the rainbow flag, staff with rainbow pins, and use of language that does not make hetero assumptions. Policy should always consider implications for gay-lesbian identity. A zero-tolerance policy for discrimination is a must.

Richard also attempted to survey LTC administrators but got back only five out of 28 questionnaires. One SWAG participant related a story about trying to get a bed for a man who was HIV-positive. She ran into all kinds of resistance.

 

But that could change. Richards points out that baby boomers entering LTC are less willing to tolerate conditions that older gays and lesbians felt that they had to accept.

Read More About:
Health, News, Ottawa, Sex

Keep Reading

Raising the bar: How an Edmonton gym is making exercise accessible

Run by queer and trans professionals, Action Potential Fitness was created with LGBTQ2S+ clients in mind
The Ohio state legislature building with a blue star with stars and stripes behind it.

Ohio’s trans healthcare ban sets dangerous precedent ahead of 2024 election

ANALYSIS: Ohio has set a new precedent for using gubernatorial powers to indirectly outlaw transition—other states may follow
Danielle Smith wears a blue top, grey blazer and pearls. She stands behind a podium with an Alberta sign, in front of Canadian and Alberta flags.

Can the federal government stop Danielle Smith’s anti-trans policies?

OPINION: The answer, like the politics that surround the proposals themselves, is complex
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wears green and pearls; she holds a white binder. A blue wall with a window is behind her.

Canada’s right is ushering in a dangerous anti-science era

OPINION: Provincial and federal leaders like Pierre Poilievre and Danielle Smith are willing to spew misinformation, take away healthcare and ultimately put trans youth at risk—all to score political points