Court: Transport for London decision to ban gay-cure ads not unlawful

BY NATASHA BARSOTTI — London’s High Court has upheld Transport for London’s (TfL) decision to ban anti-gay advertisements on its buses, Pink News reports.

The ads, with the message “Not Gay! Ex-Gay, Post-Gay and Proud. Get over it,” were to be placed on 24 buses in response to another ad campaign by the gay rights group Stonewall that said, “Some people are gay. Get over it.”

According to Pink News, Core Issues Trust, the anti-gay Christian group behind the ads, told the High Court last month that TfL’s decision to pull them was unlawful and threatened democratic freedoms.

Justice Lang found that while TfL’s introduction of the ban was “procedurally unfair” and breached its own procedures, the factors against running the ads — they would cause “grave offence,” were perceived as homophobic, and would increase the risk of prejudice and homophobic attacks — outweighed those concerns.

London Mayor Boris Johnson also found the ads to be “clearly offensive.”

“In a city where over half of gay young people face bullying at school, and where tens of thousands of gay people are subjected to hate crimes every year just because of the way they were born, it’s perfectly proper for a mayor to object to the use of such advertising in an iconic public setting,” Pink News quotes Stonewall head Ben Summerskill as saying.

Gay rights advocate Peter Tatchell disagrees with the ruling, saying Core Issues Trust should have been allowed to place the ads on buses, despite their offensive message.

Writing in Pink News, he says the ads’ suggestion that gay people can be cured is misleading, but the language is “not abusive, menacing or threatening.”

“On balance, on the grounds of free speech, the adverts should not have been banned. The suggestion that they risked increasing public prejudice and hate crime is doubtful,” he says. While Tatchell agrees with Justice Lang’s conclusion that the ads are offensive to gay people, he says that’s not a “legitimate basis for banning anything.”

“In a free society there is no right to not be offended. Almost anything that anyone says can potentially be deemed offensive by someone,” he writes. “The law should not cater to the sensitivities of any section of the public. If it did, many adverts, plays, books and films would be banned.”

“Banning these adverts reminds me of the bad old days when gay adverts were banned on the grounds that they were offensive,” he continues. “For decades, gay helplines, youth groups and campaign organisations faced bans on advertising their services. It is not right for the gay community to turn around and adopt the oppressive, anti-free speech tactics of our past oppressors.”

 

The High Court has given Core Issues Trust permission to appeal the ruling.

Natasha Barsotti is originally from Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean. She had high aspirations of representing her country in Olympic Games sprint events, but after a while the firing of the starting gun proved too much for her nerves. So she went off to university instead. Her first professional love has always been journalism. After pursuing a Master of Journalism at UBC , she began freelancing at Xtra West — now Xtra Vancouver — in 2006, becoming a full-time reporter there in 2008.

Keep Reading

Job discrimination against trans and non-binary people is alive and well

OPINION: A study reveals that we have a long way to go to reach workplace equality for trans and non-binary people

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community

Over 300 anti-LGBTQ2S+ bills have been introduced this year. This doesn’t mean we should panic

OPINION: While it’s important to watch out for threats, not all threats are created equally. Some of these bills will die a natural death

Xtra’s top LGBTQ2S+ stories of the year

The best and brightest—even most bewildering—stories from a back catalogue brimming with insight